School Accountability Report Card    
  Reported for School Year 2002-2003  

Published During 2003-2004

 

Notes regarding the source and currency of data:
Data included in this School Accountability Report Card (SARC) are consistent with State Board of Education guidelines, which are available at the California Department of Education Web site at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ope/sarc/data.htm. Most data presented in this report were collected from the 2002-03 school year or from the two preceding years (2000-01 and 2001-02). Due to the certification timelines for graduation, dropout, and fiscal information, the data for these sections of the report were collected in 2001-02. A glossary of terms is available at http://www.cde.ca.gov/demographics/glossary.

 

School Information

District Information

 School Name

 Emerson Middle

 District Name

 Bakersfield City Elementary

 Principal

 Vivian Gayles

 Superintendent

 Dr. Jean Fuller

 Street

 801 Fourth St.

 Street

 1300 Baker St.

 City, State, Zip

 Bakersfield, CA    93304-2220

 City, State, Zip

 Bakersfield, CA    93305-4326

 Phone Number

 661.631.5260

 Phone Number

 661.631.4600

 FAX Number

 661.631.3157

 FAX Number

 661.326.1485

 Web Site

 www.bcsd.com/emerson

 Web Site

 www.bcsd.com

 Email Address

 gaylesv@bcsd.com

 Email Address

 fullerj@bcsd.com

 CDS Code

 15-63321-6008916

 SARC Contact

 Dr. Marvin Jones


School Description and Mission Statement

This is the fifteenth year of the School Accountability Report Card that was established by Proposition 98, an initiative passed by California voters.  As you read the Report Card, you will gain a better understanding of Emerson as a school with a record for improvement, a faculty that is professionally skilled and personally committed to meeting the learning needs of students and a student body which is enthusiastic and motivated to perform well.

 

Emerson Middle School is located in southeast central Bakersfield.  The school is 45 years old. 

 

Our Mission at Emerson Middle School is to provide a caring, learning, and educational environment where all of our students can reach their maximum potential in their preparation for life.

 


Opportunities for Parental Involvement

 Contact Person Name

 Michelle Fraizer

 Contact Person Phone Number

 661.631.5260

Emerson’s parents are involved not only in classroom activities, School Site Council and School Advisory committees, but also in the Parent Teacher Student Association (PTSA) and other committees, which generate funds for several school projects, including reading incentives and the many awards given at all grade levels throughout the year.  Parent participation is outstanding in its support of our many programs, such as the Spelling Bee, Oral Language Festival, D.A.R.E. and Career Day, and the various band and choir activities.  In addition, our parents are actively involved in the school program through parent conferences, School Site Council, Parent Education Classes, Back-To-School Night, community forums, the eight-grade banquet and the Magic Mountain trip.

 


I. Demographic Information

Student Enrollment, by Grade Level
Data reported are the number of students in each grade level as reported by the California Basic Educational Data System (CBEDS).

 Grade Level

 Enrollment

 Grade 6

304 

 Grade 7

357 

 Grade 8

324 

 Total Enrollment

985 


Student Enrollment, by Ethnic Group
Data reported are the number and percent of students in each racial/ethnic category as reported by CBEDS.

 Racial/Ethnic Category

 Number
of
Students

 Percent
of
Students

 Racial/Ethnic Category

 Number
of
Students

 Percent
of
Students

 African-American

314 

31.9 

 Hispanic or Latino

512 

52.0 

 American Indian or Alaska Native

0.6 

 Pacific Islander

0.5 

 Asian

29 

2.9 

 White (Not Hispanic)

109 

11.1 

 Filipino

0.9 

 Multiple or No Response

0.1 


II. School Safety and Climate for Learning

School
Safety Plan

 Date of Last Review/Update

  5/22/03

 Date Last Discussed with Staff

  5/22/03

Emerson established its Comprehensive School Safety Plan in 1998.  A law enforcement officer specializing in safety provided direction in the establishment of the School Safety Plan.  Emerson’s School Safety Plan is current and is updated annually.  Key elements of Emerson’s School Safety Plan include the following: (a) routine and emergency disaster procedures; (b) suspension, and expulsion procedures; (c) teacher notification of pupils with a specific discipline history; (d) child abuse reporting procedures, (e) the district’s sexual harassment policy; (f) school crime data; (g) the student dress code; (h) safe entrance and exit procedures; (i) the civil defense and disaster plan; and (j) discipline rules and procedures.  Our overall goal is to maintain a safe and orderly school environment conducive to learning.

 


School Programs and Practices that Promote a Positive Learning Environment

To provide a safe environment for learning, the teachers and administrative staff developed a school-wide discipline plan.  Students are encouraged to solve problems with the assistance of school counselors, administrators, teachers and peers.  School/home communications are conducted through newsletters, flyers, phone calls or direct contact.

 

In addition, to assist parents with after school childcare and to keep students out of danger, Emerson has an afterschool program, which services students from 2:30pm – 6:00pm.  Students receive tutoring, homework assistance, fun activities (i.e. game-room and interest clubs) and sports.

 

We have community partnerships with Ebony Counseling Center, Cal State Bakersfield, Advancement Via Individual Determination Program (AVID), Pepsi Cola, Frito Lay, Adobe Krow and many city and county organizations.  These organizations provide both staff and monetary assistance to our various Emerson programs and have made a significant contribution to the success of our school over the past years.  Some have given considerable sums of money to the school in the form of teacher grants and funds to support the various school programs.  They also provide speakers, mentors and tutors to bolster our school programs.

 

Cal State Bakersfield provides personnel for ETS Achievers, which provides help with homework and career planning.  AVID is a middle school and high school program designed to increase student performance and college eligibility, which also include connecting students to community businesses and organizations.

 


Suspensions and Expulsions
Data reported are the number of suspensions and expulsions (i.e., the total number of incidents that result in a suspension or expulsion). The rate of suspensions and expulsions is the total number of incidents divided by the school's total enrollment as reported by CBEDS for the given year. In unified school districts, a comparison between a particular type of school (elementary, middle, high) and the district average may be misleading. Schools have the option of comparing their data with the district-wide average for the same type of school.

 

 School

 District

 2001

 2002

 2003

 2001

 2002

 2003

 Number of Suspensions

296 

314

998

3127

3319

9451

 Rate of Suspensions

34% 

35%

101%

11%

12%

34%

 Number of Expulsions

10 

13

9

127

140

136

 Rate of Expulsions

1% 

1%

1%

0%

1%

0%


School Facilities

Emerson School was built in 1956 and modernized in 1994.  It sits on 11.36 acres of which 6.37 acres is playground.  This school has 43 classrooms, a multi-purpose facilityand an instructional materials center.  The campus has a staff lounge and a workroom.

 

The custodial staff adheres to a weekly cleaning schedule that includes classrooms, restrooms, the cafeteria and kitchen areas.

 

The District’s Mobile Maintenance Team visits the school site at least twice a year.  Maintenance emergencies are addressed immediately.  District personnel maintain the grounds at least once every two weeks.

 


III. Academic Data

Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR)
Through the California Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) Program, students in grades 2-11 are tested annually in various subject areas. Currently, the STAR program includes California Standards Tests (CST) in English-language arts and mathematics in grades 2-11, science and history/social science in grades 9-11, and a norm-referenced test, which tests reading, language, and mathematics in grades 2-11, spelling in grades 2-8, and science in grades 9-11.

California Standards Tests (CST)
The California Standards Tests (CST) show how well students are doing in relation to the state content standards. Student scores are reported as performance levels. The five performance levels are Advanced (exceeds state standards), Proficient (meets state standards), Basic (approaching state standards), Below Basic (below state standards), and Far Below Basic (well below state standards). Students scoring at the Proficient or Advanced level meet state standards in that content area. Detailed information regarding results for each grade and proficiency level can be found at the California Department of Education Web site at http://star.cde.ca.gov/ or by speaking with the school principal. Note: To protect student privacy, scores are not shown when the number of students tested is 10 or less.

CST - All Students
Data reported are the percent of students achieving at the proficient or advanced level (meeting or exceeding the state standard) and percent not tested.

 Performance Level

 School

 District

 State

 2001

 2002

 2003

 2001

 2002

 2003

 2001

 2002

 2003

English Language Arts

 Proficient or Advanced

 8

 12

 13

 16

 16

 20

 30

 32

 35

 Not Tested

 12

 7

 2

 5

 7

 1

 6

 8

 1

Mathematics

 Proficient or Advanced

 

 10

 12

 

 19

 24

 

 31

 35

 Not Tested

 ---

 ---

 ---

 ---

 ---

 ---

 ---

 ---

 ---

Science

 Proficient or Advanced

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 30

 27

 Not Tested

 ---

 ---

 ---

 ---

 ---

 ---

 ---

 ---

 ---

History/Social Science

 Proficient or Advanced

 

 

 5

 

 

 14

 

 28

 28

 Not Tested

 ---

 ---

 ---

 ---

 ---

 ---

 ---

 ---

 ---


CST - Racial/Ethnic Groups
Data reported are the percent of students achieving at the proficient or advanced level (meeting or exceeding the state standard) and percent not tested.

 Performance Level

 African-
American

 American
Indian or
Alaska
Native

 Asian

 Filipino

 Hispanic
or Latino

 Pacific
Islander

 White
(not
Hispanic)

English Language Arts

 Proficient or Advanced

 11

 

 8

 

 13

 

 24

 Not Tested

 3

 

 0

 

 1

 

 6

Mathematics

 Proficient or Advanced

 10

 

 0

 

 13

 

 16

 Not Tested

 ---

 ---

 ---

 ---

 ---

 ---

 ---

Science

 Proficient or Advanced

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Not Tested

 ---

 ---

 ---

 ---

 ---

 ---

 ---

History/Social Science

 Proficient or Advanced

 1

 

 

 

 5

 

 18

 Not Tested

 ---

 ---

 ---

 ---

 ---

 ---

 ---


CST - Subgroups
Data reported are the percent of students achieving at the proficient or advanced level (meeting or exceeding the state standard) and percent not tested.

Performance Level

 Male 

Female

English
Learners

Socioeconomically
Disadvantaged

Students With
Disabilities

Migrant
Education
Services

Yes

No

Yes

No

English Language Arts

 Proficient or Advanced

 14

 13

 1

 12

 40

 0

 15

 

 Not Tested

 2

 2

 1

 2

 3

 2

 2

 

Mathematics

 Proficient or Advanced

 14

 9

 3

 11

 23

 0

 14

 

 Not Tested

 ---

 ---

 ---

 ---

 ---

 ---

 ---

 ---

Science

 Proficient or Advanced

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Not Tested

 ---

 ---

 ---

 ---

 ---

 ---

 ---

 ---

History/Social Science

 Proficient or Advanced

 6

 3

 0

 4

 10

 0

 5

 

 Not Tested

 ---

 ---

 ---

 ---

 ---

 ---

 ---

 ---


Norm-Referenced Test (NRT)
Reading and mathematics results from the Norm-Referenced Test (NRT), adopted by the State Board of Education (this was the Stanford 9 test up until 2003, but was changed to the California Achievement Test, Sixth Edition for 2003), are reported for each grade level as the percent of tested students scoring at or above the 50th percentile (the national average). School results are compared to results at the district and state levels. Detailed information regarding results for each grade level can be found at the California Department of Education Web site at http://star.cde.ca.gov/ or by speaking with the school principal. Note: To protect student privacy, scores are not shown when the number of students tested is 10 or less.

NRT - All Students
Data reported are the percent of students scoring at or above the 50th percentile.

Subject

 School

 District

 State

 2001

 2002

 2003

 2001

 2002

 2003

 2001

 2002

 2003

 Reading

 19

 23

 18

 32

 31

 26

 44

 45

 43

 Mathematics

 23

 25

 23

 37

 38

 32

 53

 55

 50


NRT - Racial/Ethnic Groups
Data reported are the percent of students scoring at or above the 50th percentile.

Subject

 African-
American

 Asian

 Hispanic
or Latino

 White
(not
Hispanic)

 Reading

 16

 8

 16

 34

 Mathematics

 17

 15

 24

 34


NRT - Subgroups
Data reported are the percent of students scoring at or above the 50th percentile.

Subject

   Male  

 Female

 English
Learners

Socioeconomically
Disadvantaged

 Students With
Disabilities

 Migrant
Education
Services

 Yes

 No

 Yes

 No

 Reading

 16

 19

 4

 17

 43

 2

 20

 

 Mathematics

 25

 21

 8

 22

 51

 0

 26

 


California Physical Fitness Test
Data reported are the percent of students meeting fitness standards (scoring in the healthy fitness zone on all six fitness standards). Detailed information regarding the California Physical Fitness Test may be found at the California Department of Education Web site at http://www.cde.ca.gov/statetests/pe/pe.html. Note: To protect student privacy, scores are not shown when the number of students tested is 10 or less.

 Grade
Level

 School

 District

 State

  Total 

 Female

  Male 

  Total 

 Female

  Male 

  Total 

 Female

  Male 

 7

 5.8

 2.4

 9.6

 20.5

 18.5

 22.3

 27.2

 28.9

 25.5


Academic Performance Index (API)

The Academic Performance Index (API) is a score on a scale of 200 to 1000 that annually measures the academic performance and progress of individual schools in California. On an interim basis, the state has set 800 as the API score that schools should strive to meet.

Growth Targets: The annual growth target for a school is 5 percent of the distance between its Base API and 800. The growth target for a school at or above 800 is to remain at or above 800. Actual growth is the number of API points a school gained between its base and growth years. Schools that reach their annual targets are eligible for awards. Schools that do not meet their targets and have a statewide API rank of one to five are eligible to participate in the Immediate Intervention/Underperforming Schools Program (II/USP), which provides resources to schools to improve their academic achievement. There was no money allocated to the II/USP Program in 2002 or 2003.

Subgroup APIs and Targets: In addition to a schoolwide API, schools also receive API scores for each numerically significant subgroup in the school (i.e., racial/ethnic subgroups and socioeconomically disadvantaged students). Growth targets, equal to 80 percent of the school's target, are also set for each of the subgroups. Each subgroup must also meet its target for the school to be eligible for awards.

Percent Tested: In order to be eligible for awards, elementary and middle schools must test at least 95 percent of their students in grades 2-8 and high schools must test at least 90 percent of their students in grades 9-11 on STAR.

Statewide Rank: Schools receiving a Base API score are ranked in ten categories of equal size (deciles) from one (lowest) to ten (highest), according to type of school (elementary, middle, or high school).

Similar Schools Rank: Schools also receive a ranking that compares that school to 100 other schools with similar demographic characteristics. Each set of 100 schools is ranked by API score from one (lowest) to ten (highest) to indicate how well the school performed compared to schools most like it.

API criteria are subject to change as new legislation is enacted into law. Detailed information about the API and the Public Schools Accountability Act (PSAA) can be found at the California Department of Education Web site at http://www.cde.ca.gov/psaa/api/ or by speaking with the school principal.

Schoolwide API

 API Base Data

 API Growth Data

 

 2000

 2001

 2002

 

From
2000
to 2001

From
2001
to 2002

From
2002
to 2003

 Percent Tested

 97

 99

 99

 Percent Tested

 98

 99

 99

 API Base Score

 493

 484

 513

 API Growth Score

 484

 505

 542

 Growth Target

 15

 16

 14

 Actual Growth

 -9

 21

 29

 Statewide Rank

 2

 1

 1

 

 Similar Schools Rank

 8

 4

 5


API Subgroups - Racial/Ethnic Groups

 API Base Data

 API Growth Data

 

 2000

 2001

 2002

 

From
2000
to 2001

From
2001
to 2002

From
2002
to 2003

 African-American

 African-American

 API Base Score

 458

 437

 488

 API Growth Score

 441

 492

 533

 Growth Target

 12

 13

 11

 Actual Growth

 -17

 55

 45

 Hispanic or Latino

 Hispanic or Latino

 API Base Score

 458

 468

 511

 API Growth Score

 460

 495

 534

 Growth Target

 12

 13

 11

 Actual Growth

 2

 27

 23

 White (Not Hispanic)

 White (Not Hispanic)

 API Base Score

 572

 

 

 API Growth Score

 

 

 

 Growth Target

 12

 

 

 Actual Growth

 

 

 


API Subgroups - Socioeconomically Disadvantaged

 API Base Data

 API Growth Data

 

 2000

 2001

 2002

 

From
2000
to 2001

From
2001
to 2002

From
2002
to 2003

 API Base Score

 476

 472

 507

 API Growth Score

 470

 499

 535

 Growth Target

 12

 13

 11

 Actual Growth

 -6

 27

 28


Awards and Intervention Programs
Eligibility for statewide award or intervention programs is based on API growth data from the previous academic year.
The Immediate Intervention/Underperforming Schools Program was not funded for the year 2002 or 2003.

 School

 District

 Federal Programs

 2001

 2002

 2003

 Federal Programs

 2001

 2002

 2003

 Recognition for
 Achievement (Title 1)

 No

 No

 No

 Number of Schools Identified
 for Program Improvement

 3

 0

 12

 Identified for Program
 Improvement (Title 1)

 No

 No

 No

 Percent of Schools Identified
 for Program Improvement

 7.0

 0.0

 28.6

 Exited Title 1 Program
 Improvement

 No

 No

 No

 

 Years Identified for
 Program Improvement

 4

 5

 6

 California Programs

 2001

 2002

 2003

 Eligible for Governor's
 Performance Award

 No

 Yes

 Yes

 
 Eligible for II/USP

 n/a

 ---

 ---

 
 Applied for II/USP Funding

 n/a

 ---

 ---

 
 Received II/USP Funding

 n/a

 ---

 ---


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
The federal No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) requires that all students perform at or above the proficient level on the state's standards-based assessments by 2014. In order to achieve this goal and meet annual performance objectives, districts and schools must improve each year according to set requirements. Data reported show whether all groups of students in the school made Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). Detailed information about AYP can be found at the California Department of Education Web site at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ayp/ or by speaking with the school principal.

 Groups

 School

 District

 2001

 2002

 2003

 2001

 2002

 2003

 All Students

 ---

 ---

 No

 ---

 ---

 Yes

 African American

 ---

 ---

 No

 ---

 ---

 Yes

 Hispanic or Latino

 ---

 ---

 No

 ---

 ---

 Yes

 Socioeconomically Disadvantaged

 ---

 ---

 No

 ---

 ---

 Yes

 English Learners

 ---

 ---

 No

 ---

 ---

 No

 Students with Disabilities

 ---

 ---

 No

 ---

 ---

 No


V. Class Size


Average Teaching Load and Teaching Load Distribution
Data reported are the average class size and the number of classrooms that fall into each size category (i.e., number of students), by subject area as reported by CBEDS.

 Subject

 2001

 2002

 2003

 Avg.
Class
Size

Number of Classrooms

 Avg.
Class
Size

Number of Classrooms

 Avg.
Class
Size

Number of Classrooms

 1-22

 23-32

 33+

 1-22

 23-32

 33+

 1-22

 23-32

 33+

 English

 25.50

 9

 31

 4

 25.88

 10

 30

 2

 25.75

 13

 32

 7

 Mathematics

 28.00

 3

 14

 5

 31.00

 

 12

 6

 26.68

 5

 14

 6

 Science

 31.00

 1

 7

 10

 31.83

 

 10

 8

 31.41

 2

 7

 13

 Social Science

 30.67

 

 13

 5

 32.17

 1

 8

 9

 27.71

 5

 13

 6


VI. Teacher and Staff Information

Teacher Credentials
Data reported are the number of teachers (full-time and part-time). Each teacher is counted as '1'. If a teacher works at two schools, he/she is only counted at one school. Data are not available for teachers with a full credential and teaching outside his/her subject area.

 

   2001  

   2002  

   2003  

 Total Teachers
 

 40

 41

 45

 Teachers with Full Credential
 (full credential and teaching in subject area)

 25

 28

 31

 Teachers Teaching Outside Subject Area
 (full credential but teaching outside subject area)

 3

 3

 4

 Teachers with Emergency Credential
 (includes District Internship, University Internship, Pre-Interns, and Emergency Permits)

 15

 13

 14

 Teachers with Waivers
 (does not have credential and does not qualify for an Emergency Permit)

 

 

 


Teacher Evaluations

Teacher evaluation procedures are defined in the collective bargaining agreement, evaluation documents utilized in the evaluation process, Board of Education policy, and communications prepared by Personnel Services.  Teachers in permanent status are evaluated biennially, but may be evaluated annually.  Teachers in any other status are evaluated annually.  The criteria for evaluation is developed collaboratively between the school principal and teacher.  The results of the evaluation are shared with the teacher with a copy placed in the teacher’s personnel file.  The rating on the teacher evaluation checklist are:  meets standards, needs improvement, and unsatisfactory.

 


Substitute Teachers

The District provides qualified substitutes when teachers are absent.  If the District experiences difficulty in obtaining substitutes on a particular day due to a short supply and excessive demands, capable and qualified support personnel at our own school are available to substitute.

 


Counselors and Other Support Staff
Data reported are in units of full-time equivalents (FTE). One FTE is defined as a staff person who is working 100 percent (i.e., full time). Two staff persons who each work 50 percent of full time also equals one FTE.

 Title

   FTE  

 Counselor

 2

 Librarian

 1

 Other

 2


Academic Counselors
Data reported are in units of full-time equivalents (FTE). One FTE is defined as a staff person who is working 100 percent (i.e., full time). Two staff persons who each work 50 percent of full time also equals one FTE. The ratio of students per academic counselor is defined as enrollment as reported by CBEDS divided by the full-time-equivalent academic counselors.

 Number of Academic
Counselors (FTE)

 Ratio of Students Per
Academic Counselor

 2

 449.50


VII. Curriculum and Instruction

School Instruction and Leadership

Leadership of the school is shared.  The principal, staff and School Site Council are models for the same leadership and cooperation expected from the students.

 

Dr. Gayles has been the principal of Emerson Middle School for the past four years.  Her past experience includes clerical, teaching various grades in elementary and middle school, program specialist for Math Matters, vice principal of a middle school and principal of an elementary school.  Dr. Gayles also teaches at California State University, Bakersfield (CSUB) and National University in the teacher credentialing program.  Since coming to Emerson, Dr. Gayles has worked with support staff, the school leadership team, teachers, parents and students to raise student achievement.  The support staff is composed of the principal, vice principal, office teacher, counselors, SB 65 coordinator, program specialists, campus security, school secretary, head custodian and cafeteria manager.  The school leadership team has a teacher representative from every subject area and grade level.  Dr. Gayles has participated as a guest speaker at several churches and community organizations to inform and educate parents on methods of improving student academic performance.

 

The highly professional support and leadership teams work toward the same goals—ensuring the quality of instruction, and increasing student learning.

 

The staff endeavors to give students a balanced variety of explicit direct instruction, hands-on experiences and student-centered activities.  Students’ progress is increased through the use of computers and multimedia technology.

 

The classroom environments are supportive by providing activities and instruction to help all students.  All students receive standard-based instruction with teachers utilizing the core curriculum and assessment tools provided by the district.  This includes meeting the needs of students identified as achieving below their peers, special education and limited English proficient.

 

The instruction at Emerson is constantly being reviewed and improved.  The goal at Emerson is to strive for excellence in all areas.

 


Professional Development

Professional Development Days are designed to provide continuous learning opportunities for administrators, teachers, and classified personnel.  These days affirm the basic philosophy of education that learning is a lifelong process that contributes to the well being of the students, teachers, administrators, and community.

 

Three Professional Development Days for certificated staff were scheduled during the 2003-2004 school year. All of the days were planned by the school sites to meet their individual needs.  The days were scheduled prior to the opening of school, during the fall and winter.  All professional development days were scheduled outside of the regular school calendar.

 

Through reading, math and technology grants awarded by the state, the district has been able to provide extensive training throughout the school year.  Each of these sessions were held during the afternoon and on Saturdays, to support teachers in their implementation of a balanced reading/language arts, the integration of technology and mathematics intervention strategies. 

 

New teachers received professional development through the Beginning Teacher Support and Assessment (BTSA) program.  The focus of training was in the California Formative Assessment and Support System for Teachers (CFASST), California Standards for the Teaching Profession (CSTP) and the California Academic Content Standards.  In addition, professional development was provided to meet induction requirements of SB 2042 leading to the California Clear Teaching Credential.  Each beginning teacher was assigned a veteran teacher who served as a support provider.  The support providers received on-going professional development in CFASST, coaching strategies, and instructional techniques.  Professional development was provided through individual mentor, monthly meetings, and after-school or weekend workshops.

 

Pre-Intern and Intern teachers received professional development at monthly meetings focusing on the initial teaching skills of the CSTP including classroom management, lesson planning, assessment, and establishing a climate that is conducive to student achievement.  Forty hours of professional development, entitled Initial Teaching Training, was made available to Pre-intern and Intern teachers prior to the beginning of the school session.  Each Pre-intern and Intern was assigned a coach that provided day-to-day support in these areas as well as advisement toward meeting credential requirements.

 

Counseling, mentoring, and videotaping was provided on an individual basis to teachers seeking certification through the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards (NBPTS).  NBPTS candidates met weekly with previous certified teachers who supported the new applicants in the application process.

 


Quality and Currency of Textbooks and Other Instructional Materials

All textbooks and instructional materials provided by the district are aligned with the California State Frameworks and State Academic Content Standards.  Districtwide committees of teachers, principals, and parents under the direction of the Director of Curriculum and Standards evaluate and select materials from the state list of approved materials.  These identified materials meet the rigor of the California Academic Content Standards. 

 

The following instructional materials are standards-based and adopted from the state list:

 

Content Area

Grade

Level

Publisher

 

Textbook

Adoption

Year

History/Social Science

K-6

 

7

 

8

Harcourt Brace

 

Houghton Mifflin

 

Glencoe/McGraw-Hill

Harcourt Social Science

 

Across the Centuries

 

The American Journey

1999-2000

Science

K-5

 

6-8

Harcourt Brace

 

Holt, Rinehart and Winston

Harcourt Science

 

Holt Science and Technology

2000-2001

Mathematics

K-5

 

6-8

 

8*

Houghton Mifflin

 

McDougal Littell

 

Glencoe

Houghton Mifflin Mathematics and Matematicas (Spanish)

 

Mathematics Concepts and Skills and Algebra 1 Concepts and Skills

 

Mathematics Applications and Connections 3

2001-2002

 

 

 

2000-2001

Reading/

Language Arts

K-5

 

 

 

6-8

Houghton Mifflin

 

 

 

Holt Rinehart Winston

Reading California

 

Lectura (Spanish)

 

Holt Literature and Language Arts

2002-2003

 

*  The Glencoe Mathematics Program used by some 8th graders is not on the current adoption list but on the AB 2519 list.  These materials are used to assist students in preparation for the high school exit exam and Algebra I.

 


Instructional Minutes
The California Education Code establishes the required number of instructional minutes per year for each grade. Data reported compares the number of instructional minutes offered at the school level to the state requirement for each grade.

 Grade
Level

 Instructional Minutes

 Offered

 State Requirement

 6

 59,220

 54,000

 7

 59,220

 54,000

 8

 59,220

 54,000


Total Number of Minimum Days

There are a total of eight minimum days during the school year.  The minimum days are scheduled to allow time for parent conferences and other duties.

 


IX. Fiscal and Expenditure Data

Average Salaries (Fiscal Year 2001-2002)
Data reported are the district average salary for teachers, principals, and superintendents, compared to the state average salaries for districts of the same type and size, as defined by Education Code Section 41409. The district average principal salary is shown separately for elementary, middle, and high schools, but the state average principal salary is combined.

 Category

 District
Amount

 State Average
For Districts
In Same Category

 Beginning Teacher Salary

 34836

 37036

 Mid-Range Teacher Salary

 52518

 60113

 Highest Teacher Salary

 67712

 74006

 Average Principal Salary (Elementary)

 88952

 89875

 Average Principal Salary (Middle)

 93958

 Average Principal Salary (High)

 

 Superintendent Salary

 148394

 138150

 Percent of Budget for Teacher Salaries

 43.81

 45.72

 Percent of Budget for Administrative Salaries

 3.92

 5.57


Expenditures (Fiscal Year 2001-2002)
Data reported are total dollars expended in the district, and the dollars expended per student at the district compared to the state average. Detailed information regarding expenditures may be found at the California Department of Education Web site at http://www.cde.ca.gov/fiscal/financial/.

 District

 District

 State Average
For Districts
In Same Category

 State Average
All Districts

 Total Dollars

 Dollars per Student
(ADA)

 Dollars per Student
(ADA)

 Dollars per Student
(ADA)

 $191071558

 $7030

 $6444

 $6719