School Accountability Report Card Reported for School Year 2002-2003 Published During 2003-2004
Notes regarding the source and currency of data: Data included in this School Accountability Report Card (SARC) are consistent with State Board of Education guidelines, which are available at the California Department of Education Web site at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ope/sarc/data.htm. Most data presented in this report were collected from the 2002-03 school year or from the two preceding years (2000-01 and 2001-02). Due to the certification timelines for graduation, dropout, and fiscal information, the data for these sections of the report were collected in 2001-02. A glossary of terms is available at http://www.cde.ca.gov/demographics/glossary.
School Information
District Information
School Name
Chipman Junior High
District Name
Bakersfield City Elementary
Principal
Dena Sprecher
Superintendent
Dr. Jean Fuller
Street
2905 Eissler St.
1300 Baker St.
City, State, Zip
Bakersfield, CA 93306-1898
Bakersfield, CA 93305-4326
Phone Number
661.631.5210
661.631.4600
FAX Number
661.631.3229
661.326.1485
Web Site
www.bcsd.k12.ca.us/chipman
www.bcsd.com
E-mail Address
sprecherd@bcsd.com
fullerj@bcsd.com
CDS Code
15-63321-6008841
SARC Contact
Dr. Marvin Jones
School Description and Mission Statement
This is the fifteenth year of the School Accountability Report Card that was established by Proposition 98, an initiative passed by California voters. This report will address nineteen areas with information taken from the 2002-03 school year.
As you read this Report Card, you will gain a better understanding of Chipman as a school with a record for improvement, a faculty that is professionally skilled and personally committed to meeting the learning needs of students and a student body which is enthusiastic and motivated to perform well.
It is the mission of Chipman Junior High School to provide an academic program that will enable all students to be productive citizens in the twenty-first century.
Opportunities for Parental Involvement
Contact Person Name
Phyllis Schmitz
Contact Person Phone Number
The school community is actively involved with school activities through the Booster Club, School Site Council, School Advisory Committee, E.L.A.C. Committee and Student Body Fund-raisers, with numerous concerts and cultural events during the year. Parent volunteers assist the music program and the school site library program. Parents are kept informed of coming events through periodic newsletters and bulletins sent home with the students. Paperback book sales at school further involve parents and proceeds are used to purchase additional library books. An informational Open House takes place at the beginning of each school year in September. Parent/teacher conferences are also held yearly during the month of November. Individual conferences may be scheduled at any time during a teacher’s preparatory period. Parent serves on the DELAC Committee and is involved in school site visits.
I. Demographic Information Student Enrollment, by Grade Level Data reported are the number of students in each grade level as reported by the California Basic Educational Data System (CBEDS).
Grade Level
Enrollment
Grade 7
433
Grade 8
404
Total Enrollment
837
Student Enrollment, by Ethnic Group Data reported are the number and percent of students in each racial/ethnic category as reported by CBEDS.
Racial/Ethnic Category
Number of Students
Percent of Students
African-American
93
11.1
Hispanic or Latino
453
54.1
American Indian or Alaska Native
17
2.0
Pacific Islander
2
0.2
Asian
13
1.6
White (Not Hispanic)
252
30.1
Filipino
7
0.8
Multiple or No Response
0
0.0
II. School Safety and Climate for Learning School Safety Plan
Date of Last Review/Update
5/12/03
Date Last Discussed with Staff
Chipman established its Comprehensive School Safety Plan in 1998. A law enforcement officer specializing in safety provided direction in the establishment of the School Safety Plan. Chipman’s School Safety Plan is current and is updated annually. Key elements of Chipman’s School Safety Plan include the following: (a) routine and emergency disaster procedures; (b) suspension, and expulsion procedures; (c) teacher notification of pupils with a specific discipline history; (d) child abuse reporting procedures, (e) the district’s sexual harassment policy; (f) school crime data; (g) the student dress code; (h) safe entrance and exit procedures; (i) the civil defense and disaster plan; and (j) discipline rules and procedures. Our overall goal is to maintain a safe and orderly school environment conducive to learning.
School Programs and Practices that Promote a Positive Learning Environment
Chipman School maintains a disciplined and stimulating learning environment. Each teacher drafts his or her own classroom discipline plan using the Assertive Discipline Model. Parents are contacted as part of the Team Approach to discipline. Parents have access to information daily from the classrooms through homework assignments and our school site web page. Chipman enforces a strict “zero tolerance” in reference to District Policy on all drug and weapon related cases. The overall discipline policy is adhered to in a manner, which ensures the safety of all students in the school environment. Chipman does, however, maintain a low suspension and expulsion rate compared to other Middle/Jr. High Schools in the District.
Suspensions and Expulsions Data reported are the number of suspensions and expulsions (i.e., the total number of incidents that result in a suspension or expulsion). The rate of suspensions and expulsions is the total number of incidents divided by the school's total enrollment as reported by CBEDS for the given year. In unified school districts, a comparison between a particular type of school (elementary, middle, high) and the district average may be misleading. Schools have the option of comparing their data with the district-wide average for the same type of school.
School
District
2001
2002
2003
Number of Suspensions
175
177
757
3127
3319
9451
Rate of Suspensions
22%
90%
11%
12%
34%
Number of Expulsions
9
12
8
127
140
136
Rate of Expulsions
1%
2%
0%
School Facilities
Chipman School was built in 1968. It sits on 18.03 acres of which 6.13 acres is playground. This school has 31 classrooms, a multi-purpose facility and a library. The campus has a staff lounge.
The custodial staff adheres to a weekly cleaning schedule that includes classrooms, restrooms, the cafeteria and kitchen areas.
The District’s Mobile Maintenance Team visits the school site at least twice a year. Maintenance emergencies are addressed immediately. District personnel maintain the grounds at least once every two weeks.
III. Academic Data Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) Through the California Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) Program, students in grades 2-11 are tested annually in various subject areas. Currently, the STAR program includes California Standards Tests (CST) in English-language arts and mathematics in grades 2-11, science and history/social science in grades 9-11, and a norm-referenced test, which tests reading, language, and mathematics in grades 2-11, spelling in grades 2-8, and science in grades 9-11. California Standards Tests (CST) The California Standards Tests (CST) show how well students are doing in relation to the state content standards. Student scores are reported as performance levels. The five performance levels are Advanced (exceeds state standards), Proficient (meets state standards), Basic (approaching state standards), Below Basic (below state standards), and Far Below Basic (well below state standards). Students scoring at the Proficient or Advanced level meet state standards in that content area. Detailed information regarding results for each grade and proficiency level can be found at the California Department of Education Web site at http://star.cde.ca.gov/ or by speaking with the school principal. Note: To protect student privacy, scores are not shown when the number of students tested is 10 or less. CST - All Students Data reported are the percent of students achieving at the proficient or advanced level (meeting or exceeding the state standard) and percent not tested.
Performance Level
State
English Language Arts
Proficient or Advanced
31
32
34
16
20
30
35
Not Tested
3
5
1
6
Mathematics
25
24
19
---
Science
27
History/Social Science
14
28
CST - Racial/Ethnic Groups Data reported are the percent of students achieving at the proficient or advanced level (meeting or exceeding the state standard) and percent not tested.
African- American
White (not Hispanic)
40
62
55
64
38
21
CST - Subgroups Data reported are the percent of students achieving at the proficient or advanced level (meeting or exceeding the state standard) and percent not tested.
Male
Female
English Learners
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged
Students With Disabilities
Migrant Education Services
Yes
No
29
54
4
36
43
37
33
42
Norm-Referenced Test (NRT) Reading and mathematics results from the Norm-Referenced Test (NRT), adopted by the State Board of Education (this was the Stanford 9 test up until 2003, but was changed to the California Achievement Test, Sixth Edition for 2003), are reported for each grade level as the percent of tested students scoring at or above the 50th percentile (the national average). School results are compared to results at the district and state levels. Detailed information regarding results for each grade level can be found at the California Department of Education Web site at http://star.cde.ca.gov/ or by speaking with the school principal. Note: To protect student privacy, scores are not shown when the number of students tested is 10 or less. NRT - All Students Data reported are the percent of students scoring at or above the 50th percentile.
Subject
Reading
51
45
26
44
52
53
50
NRT - Racial/Ethnic Groups Data reported are the percent of students scoring at or above the 50th percentile.
73
70
60
79
NRT - Subgroups Data reported are the percent of students scoring at or above the 50th percentile.
49
68
48
71
41
63
57
California Physical Fitness Test Data reported are the percent of students meeting fitness standards (scoring in the healthy fitness zone on all six fitness standards). Detailed information regarding the California Physical Fitness Test may be found at the California Department of Education Web site at http://www.cde.ca.gov/statetests/pe/pe.html. Note: To protect student privacy, scores are not shown when the number of students tested is 10 or less.
Total
22.7
20.0
25.5
20.5
18.5
22.3
27.2
28.9
Academic Performance Index (API) The Academic Performance Index (API) is a score on a scale of 200 to 1000 that annually measures the academic performance and progress of individual schools in California. On an interim basis, the state has set 800 as the API score that schools should strive to meet. Growth Targets: The annual growth target for a school is 5 percent of the distance between its Base API and 800. The growth target for a school at or above 800 is to remain at or above 800. Actual growth is the number of API points a school gained between its base and growth years. Schools that reach their annual targets are eligible for awards. Schools that do not meet their targets and have a statewide API rank of one to five are eligible to participate in the Immediate Intervention/Underperforming Schools Program (II/USP), which provides resources to schools to improve their academic achievement. There was no money allocated to the II/USP Program in 2002 or 2003. Subgroup APIs and Targets: In addition to a schoolwide API, schools also receive API scores for each numerically significant subgroup in the school (i.e., racial/ethnic subgroups and socioeconomically disadvantaged students). Growth targets, equal to 80 percent of the school's target, are also set for each of the subgroups. Each subgroup must also meet its target for the school to be eligible for awards. Percent Tested: In order to be eligible for awards, elementary and middle schools must test at least 95 percent of their students in grades 2-8 and high schools must test at least 90 percent of their students in grades 9-11 on STAR. Statewide Rank: Schools receiving a Base API score are ranked in ten categories of equal size (deciles) from one (lowest) to ten (highest), according to type of school (elementary, middle, or high school). Similar Schools Rank: Schools also receive a ranking that compares that school to 100 other schools with similar demographic characteristics. Each set of 100 schools is ranked by API score from one (lowest) to ten (highest) to indicate how well the school performed compared to schools most like it. API criteria are subject to change as new legislation is enacted into law. Detailed information about the API and the Public Schools Accountability Act (PSAA) can be found at the California Department of Education Web site at http://www.cde.ca.gov/psaa/api/ or by speaking with the school principal. Schoolwide API
API Base Data
API Growth Data
2000
From 2000 to 2001
From 2001 to 2002
From 2002 to 2003
Percent Tested
100
99
API Base Score
690
667
647
API Growth Score
669
658
656
Growth Target
Actual Growth
-21
-9
Statewide Rank
Similar Schools Rank
10
API Subgroups - Racial/Ethnic Groups
604
588
595
586
601
-18
778
773
748
767
772
-6
API Subgroups - Socioeconomically Disadvantaged
566
557
548
553
546
567
-13
-11
Awards and Intervention Programs Eligibility for statewide award or intervention programs is based on API growth data from the previous academic year. The Immediate Intervention/Underperforming Schools Program was not funded for the year 2002 or 2003.
Federal Programs
Recognition for Achievement (Title 1)
Number of Schools Identified for Program Improvement
Identified for Program Improvement (Title 1)
Percent of Schools Identified for Program Improvement
7.0
28.6
Exited Title 1 Program Improvement
Years Identified for Program Improvement
California Programs
Eligible for Governor's Performance Award
Eligible for II/USP
Applied for II/USP Funding
Received II/USP Funding
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) The federal No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) requires that all students perform at or above the proficient level on the state's standards-based assessments by 2014. In order to achieve this goal and meet annual performance objectives, districts and schools must improve each year according to set requirements. Data reported show whether all groups of students in the school made Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). Detailed information about AYP can be found at the California Department of Education Web site at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ayp/ or by speaking with the school principal.
Groups
All Students
V. Class Size Average Teaching Load and Teaching Load Distribution Data reported are the average class size and the number of classrooms that fall into each size category (i.e., number of students), by subject area as reported by CBEDS.
Avg. Class Size
Number of Classrooms
1-22
23-32
33+
English
27.79
11
28.30
29.28
46
30.92
15
31.25
33.04
32.58
18
32.50
34.29
Social Science
30.00
31.20
34.00
VI. Teacher and Staff Information Teacher Credentials Data reported are the number of teachers (full-time and part-time). Each teacher is counted as '1'. If a teacher works at two schools, he/she is only counted at one school. Data are not available for teachers with a full credential and teaching outside his/her subject area.
Total Teachers
Teachers with Full Credential (full credential and teaching in subject area)
Teachers Teaching Outside Subject Area (full credential but teaching outside subject area)
Teachers with Emergency Credential (includes District Internship, University Internship, Pre-Interns, and Emergency Permits)
Teachers with Waivers (does not have credential and does not qualify for an Emergency Permit)
Teacher Evaluations
Teacher evaluation procedures are defined in the collective bargaining agreement, evaluation documents utilized in the evaluation process, Board of Education policy, and communications prepared by Personnel Services. Teachers in permanent status are evaluated biennially, but may be evaluated annually. Teachers in any other status are evaluated annually. The criteria for evaluation is developed collaboratively between the school principal and teacher. The results of the evaluation are shared with the teacher with a copy placed in the teacher’s personnel file. The rating on the teacher evaluation checklist are: meets standards, needs improvement, and unsatisfactory.
Substitute Teachers
The District provides qualified substitutes when teachers are absent. If the District experiences difficulty in obtaining substitutes on a particular day due to a short supply and excessive demands, capable and qualified support personnel at our own school are available to substitute.
Counselors and Other Support Staff Data reported are in units of full-time equivalents (FTE). One FTE is defined as a staff person who is working 100 percent (i.e., full time). Two staff persons who each work 50 percent of full time also equals one FTE.
Title
FTE
Counselor
Librarian
Academic Counselors Data reported are in units of full-time equivalents (FTE). One FTE is defined as a staff person who is working 100 percent (i.e., full time). Two staff persons who each work 50 percent of full time also equals one FTE. The ratio of students per academic counselor is defined as enrollment as reported by CBEDS divided by the full-time-equivalent academic counselors.
Number of Academic Counselors (FTE)
Ratio of Students Per Academic Counselor
397.00
VII. Curriculum and Instruction School Instruction and Leadership
The principal is a thirty one (31) year veteran in the field of education, having held the positions of classroom teacher, Special Education Consultant/Program Manager and principal for the last seventeen years serving at both elementary and middle schools. At Chipman Jr. High School administrators consist of the principal and vice-principal. Great emphasis is placed on developing and utilizing staff as instructional leaders. A designated department leader heads each core subject, physical education and exploratory departments. The leader of each Department automatically serves on a team, which fulfills Chipman’s Leadership Team. Parental input is solicited through the process of serving on many committees and surveys as well as participating as parent/liaisons between school site and district office level. The instructional program and materials are aligned with the curriculum objectives of the District and State Standards. Chipman has three resource specialist teachers to instruct students with disabilities. A program specialist adds to the team of staff leaders. Our Language Arts Department is an English and Reading blocked period of instruction. We have the ITSA after School Program, which is designed to enhance the performance of our low performing students.
In the Language Development Program, students learn basic skills in English and have assisted instruction in Spanish as needed. The goal of our Language Development Program is to move limited English proficient students successfully into English-only instruction. Positive self-esteem activities are evident through a variety of classroom and campus activities, which continue throughout the year. GATE Teachers provide class enrichment and activities for our advanced/honors students.
Program and progress are monitored by principal observation, diagnostic assessments, unit tests, teacher made tests and the SAFTI Program, progress is documented and reported via trimester report cards, November parent/teacher conferencing and individual parent/teacher conference on a ongoing basis throughout the year.
Professional Development
Professional Development Days are designed to provide continuous learning opportunities for administrators, teachers, and classified personnel. These days affirm the basic philosophy of education that learning is a lifelong process that contributes to the well being of the students, teachers, administrators, and community.
Three Professional Development Days for certificated staff were scheduled during the 2003-2004 school year. All of the days were planned by the school sites to meet their individual needs. The days were scheduled prior to the opening of school, during the fall and winter. All professional development days were scheduled outside of the regular school calendar.
Through reading, math and technology grants awarded by the state, the district has been able to provide extensive training throughout the school year. Each of these sessions were held during the afternoon and on Saturdays, to support teachers in their implementation of a balanced reading/language arts, the integration of technology and mathematics intervention strategies.
New teachers received professional development through the Beginning Teacher Support and Assessment (BTSA) program. The focus of training was in the California Formative Assessment and Support System for Teachers (CFASST), California Standards for the Teaching Profession (CSTP) and the California Academic Content Standards. In addition, professional development was provided to meet induction requirements of SB 2042 leading to the California Clear Teaching Credential. Each beginning teacher was assigned a veteran teacher who served as a support provider. The support providers received on-going professional development in CFASST, coaching strategies, and instructional techniques. Professional development was provided through individual mentor, monthly meetings, and after-school or weekend workshops.
Pre-Intern and Intern teachers received professional development at monthly meetings focusing on the initial teaching skills of the CSTP including classroom management, lesson planning, assessment, and establishing a climate that is conducive to student achievement. Forty hours of professional development, entitled Initial Teaching Training, was made available to Pre-intern and Intern teachers prior to the beginning of the school session. Each Pre-intern and Intern was assigned a coach that provided day-to-day support in these areas as well as advisement toward meeting credential requirements.
Counseling, mentoring, and videotaping was provided on an individual basis to teachers seeking certification through the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards (NBPTS). NBPTS candidates met weekly with previous certified teachers who supported the new applicants in the application process.
Quality and Currency of Textbooks and Other Instructional Materials
All textbooks and instructional materials provided by the district are aligned with the California State Frameworks and State Academic Content Standards. District-wide committees of teachers, principals, and parents under the direction of the Director of Curriculum and Standards evaluate and select materials from the state list of approved materials. These identified materials meet the rigor of the California Academic Content Standards.
The following instructional materials are standards-based and adopted from the state list:
Content Area
Grade
Level
Publisher
Textbook
Adoption
Year
K-6
Harcourt Brace
Houghton Mifflin
Glencoe/McGraw-Hill
Harcourt Social Science
Across the Centuries
The American Journey
1999-2000
K-5
6-8
Holt, Rinehart and Winston
Harcourt Science
Holt Science and Technology
2000-2001
8*
McDougal Littell
Glencoe
Houghton Mifflin Mathematics and Matematicas (Spanish)
Mathematics Concepts and Skills and Algebra 1 Concepts and Skills
Mathematics Applications and Connections 3
2001-2002
Reading/
Language Arts
Holt Rinehart Winston
Reading California
Lectura (Spanish)
Holt Literature and Language Arts
2002-2003
* The Glencoe Mathematics Program used by some 8th graders is not on the current adoption list but on the AB 2519 list. These materials are used to assist students in preparation for the high school exit exam and Algebra I.
Instructional Minutes The California Education Code establishes the required number of instructional minutes per year for each grade. Data reported compares the number of instructional minutes offered at the school level to the state requirement for each grade.
Instructional Minutes
Offered
State Requirement
59,220
54,000
Total Number of Minimum Days
There are a total of eight minimum days during the school year. The minimum days are scheduled to allow time for parent conferences and other duties.
IX. Fiscal and Expenditure Data Average Salaries (Fiscal Year 2001-2002) Data reported are the district average salary for teachers, principals, and superintendents, compared to the state average salaries for districts of the same type and size, as defined by Education Code Section 41409. The district average principal salary is shown separately for elementary, middle, and high schools, but the state average principal salary is combined.
Category
District Amount
State Average For Districts In Same Category
Beginning Teacher Salary
34836
37036
Mid-Range Teacher Salary
52518
60113
Highest Teacher Salary
67712
74006
Average Principal Salary (Elementary)
88952
89875
Average Principal Salary (Middle)
93958
Average Principal Salary (High)
Superintendent Salary
148394
138150
Percent of Budget for Teacher Salaries
43.81
45.72
Percent of Budget for Administrative Salaries
3.92
5.57
Expenditures (Fiscal Year 2001-2002) Data reported are total dollars expended in the district, and the dollars expended per student at the district compared to the state average. Detailed information regarding expenditures may be found at the California Department of Education Web site at http://www.cde.ca.gov/fiscal/financial/.
State Average All Districts
Total Dollars
Dollars per Student (ADA)
$191071558
$7030
$6444
$6719
Bottom of Form